What does fast and slow organizing mean, and how can our approach improve our outcome?

This post has its roots in the systems thinking I became curious about when I read the book Thinking Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahneman. It’s a great book, but somewhat technical. There are numerous excellent summaries available, a TED talk, and interviews with the author, Daniel, a Psychologist and Nobel Prize winner in economics.

First, I’ll provide a summary to serve as a starting point for exploring Fast and Slow Organizing. To preface this summary, I will share in the author’s own words that the origin of this book “…presents my current understanding of judgement and decision making…” (Kahneman, pg. 8). This is important to keep in mind because a lot of organizing involves decision-making. Understanding how we make decisions will give us greater insight into how successfully we get and stay organized.

System 1 Thinking=Fast Thinking

The premise behind this kind of thinking is that it’s automatic, intuitive, and effortless. It relies on skills or knowledge built over long periods of time. This allows us to make quick judgments based on skills, instincts, or easy-to-recognize patterns.

System 2 Thinking=Slow Thinking

The premise behind this kind of thinking is that it is deliberate, analytical, and requires effort. It kicks in when problems are complex, require logic, reasoning, or close calculations.

Many decision-making processes and everyday tasks are governed by fast thinking. If we had to slow way down to think about how to make a cup of coffee, tie our shoes, or think about changing car lanes, we would not be very productive; it could even be dangerous. If we know (or think we know) something about a subject, chances are that System 1 thinking will kick in quickly and give us an answer.

System 2 thinking is what we rely on when we are learning new skills, making significant and complex decisions, or are faced with anything that makes us vulnerable. It can be delightful to revel in this kind of ‘beginner’s mindset,’ where being curious and exploring topics from a range of perspectives is welcome.

From Thinking to Organizing-Fast and Slow

Since we use both systems of thinking for our day-to-day activities, it’s clear that we probably default to one system or the other based on our understanding of how to organize. Have you ever just gone about doing a task on autopilot, not really thinking about it, and doing it the way you have always done it? We all have.

When it comes to organizing, we all fall into these thinking habits. We continue to do the same thing, even though it no longer works for us. This is when fast thinking can become a hindrance or trap. We become so reliant on it that we don’t stop to question the impulsive but perhaps not efficient method behind our process.

Until we slow down and allow our slow-thinking system to kick in, we can become stuck in the system one rut. 

Curiosity or frustration might be equal motivators that lead us to slow down and look at things more deliberately. This is one of the leading factors I see when I begin to work with someone who has become stuck with organizing. The process I employ involves helping people become more curious by asking questions and slowing down the ‘automatic’ processes so we can find the best solution, which might not be the quick solution.

Slow organizing might feel like a massive waste of time, a big headache, and a never-ending task, but I promise that is not the case. Slowing down and being deliberate allows us to identify what aspects of our organizing systems are already working effectively. With these, we can continue to employ our quick thinking responses. But it’s the things that are not working that involve more cognitive awareness so that we can navigate our path to a better solution.

The great news is that over time, and with practice, even solutions that are new to us will become routine, and eventually our fast thinking system one mind can take them over too.

It can be helpful for all of us to step back and pay attention to where we are relying on each system in our day-to-day lives. Sometimes, specific systems and solutions may require a bit of evaluation and tuning to run more efficiently.